Michael Taylor v. Commonwealth
No. 2010-CA-000674-MR
Hon. Kelly Mark Easton, Judge
Action No. 01-Cr-00429Opinion Affirming, (Caperton, Moore, and Stumbo)
The circuit court determined that the KRS 439.3402 motion for relief from the 85% rule based on status as a victim of domestic violence should have been brought, if at all, either at sentencing, on direct appeal, or by way of Taylor’s motions for RCr 11.42 and CR 60.02 relief. The Court of Appeals here agrees in a published opinion.
Contributed by Susan Balliet
