Thursday, February 28, 2013
Opinion Affirming by Acree, Nickell and Stumbo concurring.
Issue: sufficiency of affidavit for search warrant.
Affidavit for search warrant of Bounds’ residence contained the following facts:
Citizen Harshfield played an answering machine message for Detective Blanton with Bounds asking Harshfield to purchase “some pills.” Harshfield said Bounds came by his apartment asking Harshfield bo buy pseudoephedrine. Harshfield said he had bought pseudoephedrine for Bounds one month prior. Harshfield said he once saw “Coleman fuel, yellow ammonia stuff, and ether in a can” in Bounds’ car. An anonymous informant told Blanton that Bounds asked him to purchase pseudoephedrine. “Meth check” showed Bounds had bought pseudoephedrine. Blanton had received numerous tips that Bounds was cooking meth.
Bounds challenged affidavit by claiming probable cause was not established because it did not say that pseudoephedrine may be used in the production methamphetamine or that Det. Blanton had any knowledge or training of a link between pseudoephedrine and the manufacture of methamphetamine. The Court of Appeals panel found such was not needed because it is well known among law enforcement that pseudoephedrine is a key ingredient used to manufacture methamphetamine.
Bounds also challenged the affidavit because there was no nexus between the suspected criminal activity and Bounds’ residence. “The critical element in a reasonable search is not that the owner of the property is suspected of crime but that there is reasonable cause to believe that the specific ‘things’ to be searched for and seized are located on the property to which entry is sought.” Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 436 U.S. 547, 556 (1978). In response, the Court of Appeals found that “in the case of drug dealers evidence is likely to be found where the dealers live.” Beckam v. Commonwealth, 284 S.W.3d 547 (Ky. App. 2009). The Court of Appeals concluded that they discern no meaningful distinction between a person dealing drugs and a person manufacturing drugs with respect to where that person may store drugs and related drug paraphernalia and that it is reasonable to assume a person who manufactures drugs does so at his residence.
Contributed by Molly Mattingly
KYA - Youth Incarceration on the Decline: Kentucky Still Confining Too Many Youth for Behaviors that Aren’t a Risk to Public Safety
The national rate of locking up young people in trouble with the law dropped by more than 40 percent over a 15-year period, with no decreases in public safety, according to a new report released by the Annie E. Casey Foundation today.
The KIDS COUNT Data Snapshot indicates that the number of young people in correctional facilities in the United States on a single day fell to 70,792 in 2010, from a high of 107,637 in 1995. The report also shows that the overwhelming majority of confined youth in the United States are charged with offenses that do not put public safety at risk, such as running away or violating probation. In 2010, only one of every four confined youth across the nation was locked up due to a violent offense (homicide, aggravated assault, robbery or sexual assault).
Kentucky’s trend of locking kids up is also going down, mirroring the national trend. In 1997, Kentucky had 1,080 youth in confinement (at a rate of 235 per 100,000 youth ages 10-17) compared with 852 youth in confinement (at a rate of 186 per 100,000 youth ages 10-17) in 2010. The decline over this time period represents a 21 percent decrease in Kentucky’s rate. In 2010, Kentucky had the 18th lowest rate in the nation of locking kids up.
While Kentucky’s downward trend shows a move toward being smarter, and not just tougher, on crime, there is still vast room for improvement. An analysis by Kentucky Youth Advocates of data from the Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice and Louisville Metro Youth Detention Services shows that only 3.8 percent of youth that were locked up during 2007-2011 were confined for violent offenses. This means that only a very minor number of confined youth pose a threat of harm to community safety.
For behaviors such as truancy and running away, which would not be considered crimes if the youth were adults, evidence-based programs can effectively address the underlying causes of behavior. Many states have implemented “Children in Need of Services” models, which recognize that there are family dynamics involved in youth misbehavior, such as running away, and work to address what is really causing that behavior. These models are more effective than confinement for minor offenses and are also less expensive.
Kentucky leaders have stepped up in addressing the juvenile justice system in the past couple of years. In 2012, the legislature created a Unified Juvenile Code Taskforce, Co-Chaired by Senator Katie Stine and Representative John Tilley, which has begun to identify ways to improve the juvenile justice system long-term. Senator Whitney Westerfield has filed a resolution (SCR 35) to reauthorize the task force so it can continue developing solutions to improve Kentucky’s juvenile justice system.
You can find the snapshot and data on youth in confinement in the KIDS COUNT Data Center.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
A year ago, addressing the American Bar Association’s National Summit on Indigent Defense, U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said that across the country, “public defender offices and other indigent defense providers are underfunded and understaffed. Too often, when legal representation is available to the poor, it’s rendered less effective by insufficient resources, overwhelming caseloads and inadequate oversight.”
In short, Holder said, “the basic rights guaranteed under Gideon have yet to be fully realized.”
Daniel T. Goyette, the chief public defender for Jefferson County in Kentucky, and a member of the ABA’s Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants, says that “despite some genuine efforts and notable advances, the criminal justice system and, more pointedly, the leadership of our executive, legislative and judicial branches of government—both state and federal —have largely failed to carry out the constitutional mandate of the Gideon decision.”
He adds: “Sadly, it has not been a priority, and we are constantly taking one step forward and two steps back.”
Monday, February 11, 2013
Gary Gamble, Sr. v. Commonwealth- COA, rendered 2/1/13, not to be published - The Court reversed and remanded when it found that the new second-degree trafficking statute (KRS 218A.1413(2)), which classifies second-degree trafficking as a Class D felony with a maximum sentence of three years, prohibits sentence enhancement under the PFO statute.
Steven Buck of the Appeals Branch represented Mr. Gamble on appeal, and Michael Bass and Steven Goble used novel motion practice to preserve the issue for appeal in circuit court.
Contributed by Molly Mattingly
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
NJDC has just released the National Juvenile Defense Standards. The Standards represent a comprehensive understanding of the role and duties of the juvenile defender in the 21st century juvenile court system, and seek to strengthen and guide the ethical and professional performance of the juvenile defense attorney. The Standards present a national approach to systematizing zealous, competent and diligent defense practice in juvenile court and set out a framework for representation that is anchored in the law, science, and professional codes of responsibility.
Click here to request additional support or a hard copy of the Standards.